On 01/03/10 10:27, Clint Dilks wrote: > On 01/03/10 10:23, John R Pierce wrote: > >> Peter Hinse wrote: >> >> >>> Am 28.02.2010 22:03, schrieb John R Pierce: >>> >>> >>> >>>> WARNING: mismatch_cnt is not 0 on >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Have a look at http://www.arrfab.net/blog/?p=199 >>> It says: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> A `echo repair>/sys/block/md0/md/sync_action` followed by a `echo >>>> check>/sys/block/md0/md/sync_action` seems to have corrected it. Now >>>> `cat /sys/block/md0/md/mismatch_cnt` returns 0 … >>>> >>>> >>>> >> Thanks. I was trying to figure out how from the mdadm commands (UGH!) >> to do a scan. >> >> # cat /sys/block/md10/md/mismatch_cnt >> 8448 >> # cat /sys/block/md11/md/mismatch_cnt >> 7296 >> >> fugly. Since the mirrors aren't checksummed, can i assume this means >> there's likely some data messups here? >> >> Anyways, the repair is running on both md10 and md11, i'll check back >> with my final results... >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> >> >> > Hi > > It has to do with aborted writes in SWAP. Your data should be fine > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > See http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?24,16699 for more info