[CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
cap at nsc.liu.se
Wed Jan 13 00:05:39 UTC 2010
On Tuesday 12 January 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 1/12/2010 10:39 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> >>> ...that said, it's not much worse than the competetion, storage simply
> >>> sucks ;-(
> >> So you are saying people dole out huge amounts of money for rubbish?
> >> That the software raid people were and have always been right?
> > Nope, storage sucks, that includes the software ;-)
> If you can split the storage up into 2TB or smaller volumes that you can
> mount into sensible locations to spread the load and avoid contention
> you can always use software RAID1.
Funny you should mention software RAID1... I've seen two instances of that
getting silently out-of-sync and royally screwing things up beyond all
Maybe this thread has gone on long enough now?
> That at least has the advantage of
> being able to recover the data from any single drive that might still
> work after a problem.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100113/0495e05e/attachment.bin
More information about the CentOS