[CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
Peter Kjellstrom
cap at nsc.liu.seMon Jan 11 13:23:54 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
- Next message: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Monday 11 January 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 01/08/2010 05:28 PM, R-Elists wrote: > > what is wrong or what problems are you referring to with cciss please ? > > problems mostly centered around management and performance issues. the > world is littered with stores of cciss fail I would certainly not go as far as saying that I like cciss, but, they are imho not much worse than other products. We currently have ~500T on p800 and it behaves quite well. As for the specifics: - Management: hpacucli is certainly odd, but then again neither tw_cli (3ware) nor cli64 (areca) shines. - Performance: certainly not a strong point, but a p800 can sustain quite a bit more than the 1G ethernet link I need. /Peter -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100111/ab16f418/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
- Next message: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list