[CentOS] unison versus rsync
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comThu Jan 14 03:27:33 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] unison versus rsync
- Next message: [CentOS] unison versus rsync
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> I didn't think unison was maintained any more - and I wouldn't expect >> anything to beat rsync with the -z option on a slow link. I'd just use >> the -P option and restart it when/if it fails. It wouldn't hurt to do >> subsets first since they will be quickly skipped when you repeat from >> the root. If you have a huge number of files it might be worth finding >> a way to update rsync to a 3.x version which will not need to xfer the >> entire directory listing before starting. > > Looks like rf has 3.0.7, thanks for that tip. Frankly, I abhor the thought > of even using rsync for this, it's over a vpn so there is absolutely no need > for encryption but I don't know another tool that can transfer diffs only? If your bandwidth is limited you shouldn't have any trouble encrypting fast enough to fill it anyway - but setting your ssh encryption to blowfish might help some. You can run rsync in daemon mode if you really want to avoid ssh, thoug. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] unison versus rsync
- Next message: [CentOS] unison versus rsync
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list