[CentOS] unison versus rsync
Joseph L. Casale
jcasale at activenetwerx.comThu Jan 14 19:45:06 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] unison versus rsync
- Next message: [CentOS] unison versus rsync
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>Put them here: >http://rpms.linuxpowered.net/hpn-ssh/ > >All the usual disclaimers apply, I have these running on a few >dozen systems at different data centers running file transfers >24/7 for the past year now that I think about it. Nate, That's great! I am not convinced yet that an rsync daemon will suit my needs from the authentication standpoint. That being said, from the windows side I have to figure out how to get hpn-ssh in windows to do simple rsync/ssh w/o encryption. The only CopSSH implementation I have found is based on OpenSSH_4.1p1-hpn OpenSSL 0.9.8 05 Jul 2005... For the sake of being ready Saturday, what is the most secure (not using ssh) to authenticate in a script with an rsync daemon? Looks like it only does the user:pass pairs (not really good for script) or host based wrapper style security? Thanks everyone! jlc
- Previous message: [CentOS] unison versus rsync
- Next message: [CentOS] unison versus rsync
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list