[CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
Karanbir Singh
mail-lists at karan.orgThu Jan 14 20:14:52 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
- Next message: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 01/12/2010 03:51 PM, nate wrote: > I've used HP/cciss on a couple hundred systems over the past 7 years, > can only recall 2 issues, both around a drive failing the controller > didn't force the drive off line, and there was no way to force it > off line using the command line tool, so had to go on site and physically > yank the drive. With the failing drive still in the array performance > tanked. I've had 2 issues today on a single machine - controller going readonly with the assumption that a disk had failed, looking at the cli stats and it actually showed all 6 disks in the dl380 G4 to be fine. I accept these are not new machines, and have a few years under their belt - but we've got similar aged kit from other places which doesnt have nearly as many issues. > > I've never used SATA on cciss, that could be a cause of issues. Were all scsi here. Maybe its just bad luck here :) - KB
- Previous message: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
- Next message: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list