[CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comWed Jan 20 17:48:25 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet
- Next message: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 1/20/2010 11:31 AM, Frank Cox wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 10:27 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > >> >> My problem is that I can only access one IP address at a time. I >> started out using dhcp and found that if I went through the dhcp >> song-and-dance then that address became active and the other one was >> disabled, and vice versa. > > I'm starting to wonder if the simplest solution to this is to punt. > > If I put a $40 router between eth2 and the big scary world, then eth2 > could become 192.168.whatever.whatever, and then this routing issue > would go away on its own and it could still talk to the outside world > (and vice versa) on its IP address from Access. > > I assume, based on the fact that I have never encountered this before on > machines with multiple ethernet cards that were on different subnets. > > Or would this still not work as it should? Why did you want this arrangement in the first place? IP routes are normally asymmetrical by design (it's a feature). I thought you said you already had a private address on eth0. Why do you need to distinguish between eth1/eth2 on the same subnet on the public side? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet
- Next message: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list