[CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
nate
centos at linuxpowered.netThu Jan 28 14:04:02 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Next message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to get some input from people who have used these options for > mounting a remote server to a local server. Basically, I need to replicate / > backup data from one server to another, but over the internet (i.e. insecure > channels) NFS and CIFS and iSCSI are all terrible for WAN backups(assuming you don't have a WAN optimization appliance), tons of overhead. Use rsync over SSH, or rsync over HPNSSH. I transfer over a TB of data a day using rsync over HPNSSH across several WANs. nate
- Previous message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Next message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list