[CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
Rudi Ahlers
rudiahlers at gmail.comThu Jan 28 21:01:38 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Next message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Anytime someone mentions backups, I have a knee-jerk reaction to mention > backuppc because it is simple and will likely do anything you need. Docs > are > here: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ It is packaged in epel. It can use > rsync > (with/without ssh), smb, or tar for the backup transport. Generally for > anything remote, you'll want rsync, and you'll want it badly enough to set > it up > even on windows targets - which is not all that difficult. > > -- > Les Mikesell > lesmikesell at gmail.com > Thank you Les, but I'm not looking for a new backup program. We rely on the platform's native backup scripts. I'm looking for recommendation for a fast, reliable & secure remote backup server platform -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100128/1363740c/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Next message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list