[CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comThu Jan 28 23:40:51 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Next message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 1/28/2010 5:23 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > So, is there any benefit in using NFS over SMB in this case? The CIFS > mounts can't be unmounted without a reboot, so they build-up a pool of > mounts to the same server which cause extra latency I don't understand either of not being able to unmount a cifs mount or not being able to avoid remounting when it is already mounted. That's probably something you can fix. The only thing that should keep you from unmounting would be if some file is open or a running process has its working directory under the mount point. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Next message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list