[CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
Dave
tdbtdb+centos at gmail.comFri Jan 29 07:49:19 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Next message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Rudi Ahlers <rudiahlers at gmail.com> wrote: > > let's keep the question simple. WHICH filesystem would be best for this > type of operation? SMB, NFS, or iSCSI? > As someone said, these are all bad if your channel is insecure. Actually I know nothing about iSCSI, maybe it is more robust. Dave -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100128/60015cae/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Next message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list