Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Gilbert Sebenste wrote on Fri, 1 Jan 2010 13:52:03 -0600 (CST): > >> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.2 required=5.0 tests=FH_DATE_PAST_20XX, >> SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 >> X-Spam-Report: >> * 3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future. > > add > > score FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 0 > > to your /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf > And you should use Bayes. A well-trained Bayes would have balanced that > down (assuming it was ham). > > Kai *nod* : my spamassasin machine didn't block any mail today (except real spam) thanks to bayes. The FH_DATE_PAST_20XX scored up but bayes scored down on the other hand so no False Positive here ;-) -- -- Fabian Arrotin test -e /dev/human/brain || ( echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq ; echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger )