On Tuesday 05 January 2010 10:57:30 Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 01/05/2010 10:41 AM, Anne Wilson wrote: > > assumed that it would bring in the best-match version, and continued. > > This morning, seeing that more updates were announced, I ran update > > again. To my surprise, exiv2 was skipped, as before. > > > > I'm curious as to what could be happening here. > > yum clean metadata; yum repolist ; yum -d9 list exi\* > > might give you some clues as to whats going on. > That gives Installed Packages exiv2.i386 0.17.1-1.el5.rf installed Available Packages exiftags.i386 1.01-1.el5.rf rpmforge exim.i386 4.63-3.el5 base exim-doc.noarch 4.63-2.el5 base exim-mon.i386 4.63-3.el5 base exim-sa.i386 4.63-3.el5 base exiv2.i386 0.19-1.el5.rf rpmforge exiv2-debuginfo.i386 0.17.1-1.el5 epel- debuginfo exiv2-devel.i386 0.19-1.el5.rf rpmforge rpmforge.repo is enabled, but is priority 5 - could this be a priority problem? Anne -- KDE Community Working Group New to KDE Software? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100105/8459303b/attachment-0005.sig>