On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:36 PM, nate <centos at linuxpowered.net> wrote: > Paras pradhan wrote: > > Thanks nate. > > > > Right now I am not concerned with the load balancing. I have few cluster > > nodes and if I run mode1 , then the failover time may lead to cluster > > timeout. I have not tested it yet but I will do it. So if the failover > time > > from active to backup is very small and in miliseconds my cluster can > afford > > that and I will stick with mode 0. Is there a way to change this > > time/durartion ? > > You can change the polling interval with the miimon option, but > I'm not sure how precise you can get, it does take some time for > the system to register a link failure, if that is infact what > causes the network to fail. Another failure mode is a layer 2 > failure which can detected in some cases using the arp monitor. > > I think rather than trying to achieve zero loss on the network > with regards to failures you should tune the cluster to be > more tolerant and not raise a fit if the network is down for > This makes sense nate. Thanks! Paras. > a second or two. > > nate > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100113/29c0c327/attachment-0005.html>