[CentOS] directory permissions set to 600?
Ski Dawg
centos at skidawg.orgTue Jul 20 23:45:36 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] samba upgrade 3.0 - 3.x problem convert passdb.tdb
- Next message: [CentOS] directory permissions set to 600?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello all, Today, I ran across a directory in /etc/ on one of our servers whose permissions where set to 600 (drw-------) with root being the owner. The directory is for the firewall package for the server, so it is not something malicious. Checking some other systems, they also have this directory and the permissions on those servers is also 600, so it isn't just a messed up permissions on this one machine. What is the difference between permissions of 600 and 700 for a directory, that is owned by root (group root)? Is there a reason why some directory should be set to 600 instead of 700? -- Doug Registered Linux User #285548 (http://counter.li.org) ---------------------------------------- Never trust a computer you can't throw out a window. -- Steve Wozniak
- Previous message: [CentOS] samba upgrade 3.0 - 3.x problem convert passdb.tdb
- Next message: [CentOS] directory permissions set to 600?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list