[CentOS] directory permissions set to 600?
Robert Nichols
rnicholsNOSPAM at comcast.netWed Jul 21 19:24:27 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] directory permissions set to 600?
- Next message: [CentOS] directory permissions set to 600?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 07/21/2010 10:30 AM, Ski Dawg wrote: > OK, my question from all of this is what is the difference between > 0600 and 0700 for a directory that is owned by root? I see the > difference for a directory owned by a non-privileged user, but if root > is the owner, then only root can do anything with it, or see anything > in it, and root will ignore the fact that the execute bit is not set > for the owner. So what is the benefit of making a root owned directory > 0600 instead of 0700? For a directory, no difference aside from a command like 'find' explicitly testing permission bits. The mode could just as well be 0000. For an ordinary file, there would be a difference. For root to execute a file, at least one of the three execute permission bits must be set. -- Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it.
- Previous message: [CentOS] directory permissions set to 600?
- Next message: [CentOS] directory permissions set to 600?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list