[CentOS] To PAE or not to PAE...
Kevin Krieser
k_krieser at sbcglobal.netThu Jul 22 17:31:12 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] To PAE or not to PAE...
- Next message: [CentOS] To PAE or not to PAE...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
But it would allow other usages of that RAM. cache. Other programs with great memory usage. Of course, as mentioned earlier, you would have to test with your workload whether the extra overhead is more than made up with the extra memory availability. On Jul 22, 2010, at 12:07 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On 7/22/2010 3:25 AM, John Doe wrote: >> >> I have a 4GB pc and was wondering if it was worth going the PAE way to gain >> those exta 700MB... > > Very few programs can use PAE to get at that extra RAM. Can the > programs you run do this? > > Is your CPU 64-bit capable? That's generally a better idea than PAE. > Keep in mind that PAE is Pentium Pro era technology. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
- Previous message: [CentOS] To PAE or not to PAE...
- Next message: [CentOS] To PAE or not to PAE...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list