Jens Neu writes: > > I think ext3 is a bit slow on so big LUNS, try xfs or similar? > > there is no official support for xfs in RHEL5, so that is not an option. > Besides, I'm talking about a drop of >150mb/s to ~10mb/s read performance > when cracking the 2.2T size. This is clearly not in the ext3 (or FS for > that matter) magnitude of performance issues. Also, numbers stay the same > when dd'ing on the raw device (LUN). This may not be relevant for you at all, but I have seen a comparable drop in read performance on a new Dell machine (hdparm -t, 25MB/s vs. 130MB/s), completely unrelated to the disk type. In this case, I had to add "pci=nommconf" to the kernel line in grub.conf. This was specific to the RH kernel, live CDs with 2.6.32 or .34 kernels were fine. I also noticed that booting up older IBM Intellistations under CentOS gave a warning about a BIOS bug ("MCFG area at e0000000 is not E820-reserved"; whatever that means :) and not using mmconfig. Also make sure that all BIOS options are set correctly, if applicable. --------------------------------------------------------------- This message and any attachments may contain Cypress (or its subsidiaries) confidential information. If it has been received in error, please advise the sender and immediately delete this message. ---------------------------------------------------------------