[CentOS] tar cvhf with link restore??
mcclnx mcc
mcclnx at yahoo.com.tw
Wed Jun 23 21:05:03 UTC 2010
I understand what you said. In theory "h" should replace link to physical file. But it really happen.
--- 10/6/23 (三),John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> 寫道:
> 寄件者: John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com>
> 主旨: Re: [CentOS] tar cvhf with link restore??
> 收件者: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org>
> 日期: 2010年6月23日,三,下午4:44
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 04:37:25AM
> +0800, mcclnx mcc wrote:
> > I am doing "tar" test due to some software require
> "tar cvhf". When I
> > using "tar cvhf and tar xvhf ", files have symbolic
> link replace by
> > physical files.
> >
> > wield things is my friend using same command 'tar cvhf
> and tar xvhf".
> > after restore link still there.
>
> I find it unlikely he's using the same
> command line; see below.
>
> > does there has way when I using "tar cvhf" and "tar
> xvhf" I can get
> > link back not physical files?
>
> -h / --dereference does not archive /
> follow the link but
> rather the file that the link points to;
> it dereferences it
> during archive creation.
>
> Simple answer: do not use -h /
> --dereference and you will have
> the behavior you wish.
>
> As always, "man tar" for more
> information.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> John
>
>
> --
> What happened should never, ever have happened. The
> families of those who
> died should not have had to live with the pain and hurt of
> that day, and a
> lifetime of loss.
>
> -- Prime Minister David Cameron of Britain, apologizing for
> the Bloody Sunday
> killings of 14 unarmed demonstrators by
> British soldiers in Londonderry,
> Northern Ireland, in 1972, New York
> Times, 16 June 2010
>
> -----內含下列夾帶檔案-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
More information about the CentOS
mailing list