[CentOS] clustered file system of choice
Juergen Gotteswinter
jg at internetx.deThu Jun 17 08:28:52 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] clustered file system of choice
- Next message: [CentOS] clustered file system of choice
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Give GFS a chance, works very well for us and centos ships it On 06/17/2010 10:19 AM, Raja Subramanian wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Boris Epstein <borepstein at gmail.com> wrote: >> I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of >> data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a >> clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that? >> Any recommendations? > > You need a shared SAN back end to run traditional cluster file systems. > > If you environment is all Linux, then Lustre (lustre.org) works well. > > If you need other OS support, the commercial alternatives like Quantum > StorNext and IBRIX (now acquired by HP) are good alternatives. > > - Raja > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >
- Previous message: [CentOS] clustered file system of choice
- Next message: [CentOS] clustered file system of choice
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list