[CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?
Scott Silva
ssilva at sgvwater.comMon Jun 28 17:15:19 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?
- Next message: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
on 6-28-2010 6:34 AM Whit Blauvelt spake the following: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 07:25:59AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: >> On 6/25/2010 8:33 AM, Brian Mathis wrote: >>> - VMware Server seems like it's EOL, even though vmware hasn't >>> specifically said so yet >> >> Given that there are known serious bugs in 2.0.2[*] and that release is >> now 8 months old, that seems plausible to me. But another plausible >> explanation is that they've decided to throw all their effort at a 3.0 >> release. > > If you look on their site, they clearly specify that they do not offer a > paid support option for VMware Server, that it's community supported only. > Does that seem like an attitude towards a product they plan to update? > > Whit That just looks like they don't want to support something they give away...
- Previous message: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?
- Next message: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list