[CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comMon Jun 28 17:47:40 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?
- Next message: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 6/28/2010 12:39 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote: > > At this point VM Server is in the 'if it breaks you get to keep all the > pieces' mode. Like just about all software, although you might get the chance for a refund on what you paid if you can prove there is a problem with advertised capabilities. Anyway, I'll repeat that my experience with VMware server 1.x has been years of running under both CentOS 3.x and 5.x and no breakage at all so far. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?
- Next message: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list