On Jun 22, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: > why does RHEL not support XFS straight out of the box? i suspect you would be more likely to receive a meaningful answer from one of these sources: https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-beta-list in addition, this bugzilla entry (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213744#c10) suggests that you can contact Eric Sandeen at RH for further information about XFS in RHEL. -shuff -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v http://five.sentenc.es -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100622/acc20018/attachment-0004.sig>