Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > On 6/29/10, Christopher Chan <christopher.chan at bradbury.edu.hk> wrote: >> raid1/iscsi if you have a single host accessing the data or gluster if >> you have more than one host accessing the data... > > This is starting to look really complicated with NCP Storage units on > zfs -> iscsi to gluster unit ext3 since gluster doesn't do zfs -> > multiple application host. gluster don't care about underlying filesystem...it don't support acl yet for a reason > > Wouldn't using both ncp/zfs with gluster be redundant since gluster > does cluster storage to begin with? ??? what cluster storage on ncp??? > > I think I might be overcomplicating things here. > > Reading up more on gluster, it seems that I could simply put a gluster > client on the application server, mount a volume mirrored on from two > gluster servers and let gluster handle the failover transparently. /me nods > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos