On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 07:25:59AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: > On 6/25/2010 8:33 AM, Brian Mathis wrote: > > - VMware Server seems like it's EOL, even though vmware hasn't > > specifically said so yet > > Given that there are known serious bugs in 2.0.2[*] and that release is > now 8 months old, that seems plausible to me. But another plausible > explanation is that they've decided to throw all their effort at a 3.0 > release. If you look on their site, they clearly specify that they do not offer a paid support option for VMware Server, that it's community supported only. Does that seem like an attitude towards a product they plan to update? Whit