On 6/28/2010 2:50 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 28/06/2010 20:31, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
>> I haven't tried it yet, still researching on which way to go (looked
>> into Lustre, then glusterFS, then now this). Coincidentally, I just
>
> Not sure what you are trying to do here. Lustre, glusterfs, gfs etc
> solve a different problem than imported remote storage ( which is
> essentially what iscsi will give you )
I think he is looking for redundant, failover remote storage (i.e.
mirrored copies from different iscsi hosts). Sort of like DRBD but with
both copies remote. I think is should work but the timing might be
tricky on retries vs. failure on the iscsi connections.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com