[CentOS] which FS is appropriate for a 2TB-sized partition?

Nux nux at li.nux.ro
Mon Mar 8 14:55:10 UTC 2010

On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Alan Hoffmeister wrote:

> On 08/03/2010 09:53, Khusro Jaleel wrote:
>> Thanks to all of you for your help, and especially Tim Shubitz who faced the same problem and his solution worked perfectly for me.
>> However, now that I have properly created a GPT partition of size 2.7TB, which filesystem is best on it? This filesystem will be used to
>> store backups of various other linux systems, so the files will be mostly small, however some systems do host big movie files and sometimes
>> SVN dumps, and DB dumps can get a little big. I am going to be using rsnapshot to do the backups, so perhaps I should be careful about the
>> number of inodes I create and try to maximise them?
>> I am thinking of using XFS, but am not sure. I seem to have heard in the past that one should avoid EXT3 on such huge filesystems, but I can't
>> find a reference or proper justification for it. JFS is another option but then some mailing list threads online say it has lost data for them so I'm a
>> bit confused as to what is best to use in my scenario.
>> As for XFS I have read that a UPS is necessary and this is not a problem since these machines are already connected to a UPS (and that UPS has
>> a backup as well).
>> Any help appreciated, thanks,
>> Khusro
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS at centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> JFS.
> http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/388
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Ext4 seems to be missing from that benchmark. I'd go ext4, imho.

More information about the CentOS mailing list