[CentOS] compilers a security risk?
m.roth at 5-cent.us
m.roth at 5-cent.usMon Mar 8 14:48:11 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] compilers a security risk?
- Next message: [CentOS] compilers a security risk?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> On 3/6/2010 4:04 PM, nate wrote: >> >> if you can upload source code, >> you can upload a precompiled binary > > True, but most attacks are automated, and try to attack as wide a range > of machines as possible. > > If I were to write a bit of malware for *ix that needed a custom binary > on the target machine, I'd at least consider distributing it as C code, > banking on the fact that most *ix systems have a C compiler installed by > default these days. <snip> Which is why, for the 10 or 11 years that I've used a linux box as a firewall router at home, it had almost *nothing* on it, and that was before I ran Bastille against it. I intended it as a cheap (old hardware, the second one was scrounged) firewall/router, and *nothing* *else*. So, when I built it, no compilers, no languages (other than things like perl and awk and shells), no X... and only one user other than the system users (me). mark
- Previous message: [CentOS] compilers a security risk?
- Next message: [CentOS] compilers a security risk?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list