m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Niki wrote: >> JohnS a écrit : >>> --- > <snip> >>> You should have better success with another 128MB of RAM.. > <snip> >> I corrected that problem, and now it *looks* like everything's OK. But >> you're right. Another 128 MB RAM won't hurt. (My first computer, a >> single-board 8080, actually had 512 *bytes* of RAM, so it's just a >> matter of adapting to modern times :oD) > > *heh* I remember the first computer I owned, and my ex and a friend > violated the warranty on the RadShack CoCo, opened it up, and doubled the > memory for a birthday present. Then, I had 32K ram! (Are you sure you > didn't mean 512K RAM?) Not unless it had some additional hardware assistance. The 8080 can only address 64K. Bob McConnell N2SPP