On Wednesday, March 17, 2010 09:41 PM, JohnS wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 21:10 +0800, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote: >> JohnS wrote: >>> On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 23:19 -0500, Neil Aggarwal wrote: >>>>> Mysql by itself has built in "clustering" though >>>>> there can be significant limitations in it depending on your >>>>> requirements. >>>> I agree. The built in cluster has too many limitations to >>>> be useful, but MySQL master-master replication gives a very >>>> good alternative to a true cluster. We use it to deploy >>>> geographically redundant systems and it has worked very >>>> well for us. >>>> >>>> Neil >>> >>> Well what are your plans when it gets the AXE?? >>> >> >> firebirdsql of course. > You have a loving for Pontiacs? Trans AM. But don't let that get in the way of replacing MySQL with firebirdsql. ;-) After they have suffered enough, then they eat crow and finally go postgresql. :-D