[CentOS] mail server best practices question
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comTue May 11 05:46:52 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] mail server best practices question
- Next message: [CentOS] mail server best practices question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Christopher Chan wrote: > > >> With reference to your other message in this thread, MailScanner calls >> spamd/clamd as part of the process but the real value in my mind is the >> granular handling in MailScanner which is sort of complete overkill but >> it totally works and scratches about every itch you ever had in running >> a mail server. > > I'm sure the same can be said of mimedefang and more. When I find > something is not met by the postfix provided mechanisms, I'll take a > look at these other solutions. MimeDefang is about as efficient as you can get because it multiplexes the milter hooks separately as needed between the front/back end processes so it doesn't keep a perl process running for every sendmail process and you don't have fast operations waiting for slow ones to complete - and it runs spamassassin in the backend daemon processes instead of starting a new copy for each message. Plus, it splits out the attachments only once for as many scanning operations as you configure. In theory, you can run MimeDefang as a postfix milter these days but I don't know if it actually works. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] mail server best practices question
- Next message: [CentOS] mail server best practices question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list