[CentOS] 5.5 ISO size vs RHEL
John R Pierce
pierce at hogranch.comWed May 19 17:55:06 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] 5.5 ISO size vs RHEL
- Next message: [CentOS] 5.5 ISO size vs RHEL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Les Mikesell wrote: > Unless maybe it was downloaded to a VFAT partition - but that's a > generic problem with dvd images. > well, FAT is a problem regardless of OS or wordsize, it flat out doesn't support files greater than 4GB
- Previous message: [CentOS] 5.5 ISO size vs RHEL
- Next message: [CentOS] 5.5 ISO size vs RHEL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list