[CentOS] ldap: adding user to multiple groups

Sat May 8 17:13:44 UTC 2010
Craig White <craigwhite at azapple.com>

On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 09:43 -0700, aurfalien at gmail.com wrote:
> On May 8, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Craig White wrote:
> 
> >> I tried that a while back, together with webmin and that php thing.
> >>
> >> I was kinda hoping to use webmin for everything; DNS, DHCP, LDAP so
> >> that a jr sys admin could manage our intranet based services.  But
> >> with LDAP, webmin doesn't seem to like adding users to groups and
> >> errors out.
> >>
> >> So I just hand edit an ldif for now and ldapmodify.
> >>
> >> I'll revisit the webmin error regarding adding users to groups and  
> >> see
> >> whats going on.
> > ----
> > I use webmin's LDAP Users and Groups to administer both users and  
> > groups
> > - it works fine if configured properly.
> 
> 
> Perfect!
> 
> You mind sharing some nuggets?
> 
> First, my issue;
> 
> Using webmin, I can add users and also add them to groups and  
> secondary group during initial creation of that user.
> 
> However if I then try to add an already created user to a secondary  
> group, webmin fails with;
> 
> Failed to save group : Failed to modify group in LDAP database :  
> modify/delete: description: no such attribute
> 
> I can do this using ldapmodify with an ldif file, just not via webmin.
> 
> I can add, remove users via webmin, I just can't add them to secondary  
> groups after I've created them.
> 
> I can only add them to secondary groups during initial creation of  
> that user.
> 
> Any help would be very very cool.
> 
> Thanks in advance Craig.
----
I only recently discovered that myself - and I noticed that only
occurred when the group is not a samba group (i.e. no sambaGroupMapping
ou) but I almost suspect that it's because I am not using 'objectclass
top' for these entries but I never really investigated further. The only
differences between the ones that I can edit and the ones I can't edit
are the objectclass 'sambaGroupMapping' and 'top'

Craig



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.