Daniel wrote: > On 05/27/2010 04:12 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Daniel wrote: >>> On 05/27/2010 02:38 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>> Daniel wrote: >>>>> On 05/27/2010 12:19 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>>>> Daniel wrote: >>>>>>> On 05/27/2010 12:00 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>>>>>> Daniel wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 05/27/2010 11:49 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Updating a system from CentOS 5.4 (current) to 5.5, and I see: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> libsepol.scope_copy_callback: zosremote: Duplicate declaration >>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>> module: >>>>>>>>>> type/attribute zos_remote_t >>>>>>>>>> libsemanage.semanage_link_sandbox: Link packages failed >>>>>>>>>> semodule: Failed! >>>>>> <snip> >>>>> Remove all audispd-zos-remote.pp and zos_remote.pp >>>>> >>>>> We ship zosremote.pp >>>> >>>> Ok... I can do that, but are you saying to just rm it, and not >>>> whatever package it came in? <snip> >>> I think you will find that it does not happen for everyone else and >>> that these files do not belong to other packages. I have a feeling that >>> something went wrong on an update that left these files around. >>> >> Hmmm...but I don't know if rm'ing them will work, if they're in the d/b. >> So I suppose I'll have to find the package that put them there... >> <time passes> >> Ok, anyone on the CentOS list: does *anyone* know where this came from? >> It' sin the directory provided by >> selinux-policy-targeted-2.4.6-279.el5.noarch, but there's no zos_remote >> in the package. >> > Trust me on this, I know what I am talking about. > > Just remove them. They were put there by previous versions of audit and > maybe selinux-policy. If you are concerned you can squirrel them away. > > selinux-policy takes all pp files in the active directory and compiles > them into a policy module. Ok, I believe you. I also found the same .pp in .../previous/, and diff said no difference, so no problem rm'ing them. mark