> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:38 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: >> I would have to agree with the repo being misconfigured. If I'm on 5.4, >> and look for updates to 5.4, it should *not* tell me that one package >> needs updating, but that, and an unnoted dependency, are both actually >> 5.5. > > You do not look for updates on 5.4, but for updates on5. And EPEL (as > ATRPMS) tags along with RHEL - so you have to be looking out for > things like that when you use CentOS. > I believe I am looking for updates on 5. But, since 5.5 is *not* released, I should not see bits and pieces that require it. What next, glibc? mark