Daniel wrote: > On 05/27/2010 02:38 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Daniel wrote: >>> On 05/27/2010 12:19 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>> Daniel wrote: >>>>> On 05/27/2010 12:00 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>>>> Daniel wrote: >>>>>>> On 05/27/2010 11:49 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>>>>>> Updating a system from CentOS 5.4 (current) to 5.5, and I see: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> libsepol.scope_copy_callback: zosremote: Duplicate declaration in >>>>>>>> module: >>>>>>>> type/attribute zos_remote_t >>>>>>>> libsemanage.semanage_link_sandbox: Link packages failed >>>>>>>> semodule: Failed! >>>> <snip> >>>>>>> Do you have multiple pp files definitin zosremote? >>>> <snip> >>>>> locate -r zos.*remote >>>>> >>>>> Might find the bad pp file. >> <snip> >>>> I don't believe they want me to remove it. Doing the locate, I find: >>>>> locate -r zos.*remote | grep .pp >>>> /etc/selinux/mls/modules/active/modules/zosremote.pp >>>> /etc/selinux/mls/modules/previous/modules/zosremote.pp >>>> /etc/selinux/targeted/modules/active/modules/zos_remote.pp >>>> /etc/selinux/targeted/modules/previous/modules/zos_remote.pp >>>> /old/etc/selinux/targeted/modules/active/modules/zos_remote.pp >>>> /old/etc/selinux/targeted/modules/previous/modules/zos_remote.pp >>>> /old/usr/share/selinux/mls/audispd-zos-remote.pp >>>> /old/usr/share/selinux/strict/audispd-zos-remote.pp >>>> /old/usr/share/selinux/targeted/audispd-zos-remote.pp >>>> /usr/share/selinux/mls/zosremote.pp >>>> /usr/share/selinux/targeted/zosremote.pp >>>> >>>> So, which should I get rid of, that was not cleaned up during the >>>> update? >>> >>> Remove all audispd-zos-remote.pp and zos_remote.pp >>> >>> We ship zosremote.pp >> >> Ok... I can do that, but are you saying to just rm it, and not whatever >> package it came in? >> >> And if it's not correct, why is it here, anyway? Anyone on the CentOS >> list? I don't want to screw around with this as "oh, it's only his weird >> problem", I figure that it's happening to a lot of other folks, and I'd >> like to make the problem go away for everyone. That, of course, means it >> the incorrect stuff needs to be removed from whatever package it's >> in.... >> > I think you will find that it does not happen for everyone else and that > these files do not belong to other packages. I have a feeling that > something went wrong on an update that left these files around. > Hmmm...but I don't know if rm'ing them will work, if they're in the d/b. So I suppose I'll have to find the package that put them there... <time passes> Ok, anyone on the CentOS list: does *anyone* know where this came from? It' sin the directory provided by selinux-policy-targeted-2.4.6-279.el5.noarch, but there's no zos_remote in the package. mark