R P Herrold wrote:
>
> Drive-bys and externalities are a problem and under the old
> design the CentOS wiki was not such a pigsty; some other team
> members lobbied for a less OCD approach on what is in and off
> topic, and how 'spoon-feeding' was treated. The jury is still
> out on this new approach in my mind; I know I get push back
> from old-timers who preferred the higher signal to noise
> ratio, and want 'quality' back as a preferred metric over
> 'friendliness' ...
>
What's a drive-by, and until a post is made and answered somewhere, how is a
user supposed to know if a failure is caused by something local (mix of
software, internet infrastructure), one repo mirror, or the basic infrastructure?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com