[CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes
keith at karsites.net
Wed Nov 3 16:01:58 UTC 2010
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Todd Denniston wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
> From: Todd Denniston <Todd.Denniston at tsb.cranrdte.navy.mil>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes
> Keith Roberts wrote, On 11/03/2010 10:32 AM:
>> On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Keith Roberts wrote:
>> There were about 79 Seek errors in the SMART logs of the
>> vivard did not show any errors when doing a full disk erase.
>> So I ran an Advanced r/w scan again with Hitachi DFT, and
>> the result was OK.
>> Any ideas what's happening please?
> WFG: In writing it all, the seek motor knocked the dust
> out of it's way? (what dust?) How about checking all the
> smart attributes and seeing if others are elevated.
> Are you seeing any block "remap" activity?
>> Is this disk usable, or is it still in need of replacing?
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.M.A.R.T.#Background You
> have gotten SMART errors from this drive already, so: You
> have to ask yourself, 'Do you feel lucky?', Well do y'a...
> And the other question: If this drive up and dies shortly
> and I knew about the smart errors, will the data owner
> complain more or less to me about the drive death later or
> drive replacement hassle now?
> Only YOU (and the data owner) know the risk trade-off
> levels you have to consider.
Thanks Todd for the reply.
There were no sectors remapped, which is odd as there were
bad sectors originally on the drive. I ran MemTest86+ out of
curiousity, and there are 5120 Errors, some at 0.4MB & 0.5
The BIOS has been playing up, not recognising the Primary
Master drive. This is the channel the Hitachi disk was on
when it developed the sector read errors.
Could a bad controller or bad RAM cause Hard Drive sector
The drive is as good as uninstalled, so I may as well send
it for replacement.
NB: The box is down now, and I'll try and test and identify
the bad memory module next.
More information about the CentOS