[CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
nkadel at gmail.com
Tue Nov 30 19:25:53 EST 2010
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 4:19 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:
> Lamar Owen wrote:
>> On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 03:49:57 pm Stephen Harris wrote:
>>> Reality check: how many of those installs are RedHat OOB installs with
>>> default options?
>> No idea. How many aren't default OOB?
>> For that matter, how many CentOS installs are out there are set:
>> 1.) OOB, SELinux enforcing/targeted;
>> 2.) SELinux permissive;
>> 3.) SELinux off;
>> 4.) SELinux enforcing, some other policy than targeted?
>> I would guess no one knows. But all of my CentOS installs are OOB as
>> concerning SELinux, except the two scalix installs, which have some custom
>> 'stuff' thanks to the scalix instance naming.
> All I know is at the last two companies I worked at - AT&T, a small team
> building software for the NOC, a smaller root CA, and here at the federal
> agency I'm at, we either turned it off, or have it set to permissive.
I disabled it on the last 1000 hosts *I* installed....
More information about the CentOS