[CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
Christopher Chan
christopher.chan at bradbury.edu.hkMon Nov 29 22:03:04 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
- Next message: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Monday, November 29, 2010 11:58 PM, aurfalien at gmail.com wrote: >>> You end up with a zillion groups - which is >>> pointless and unmaintainable. Thank goodness for ACL support and >>> setfacl/getfacl. >> >> So what do you do when you have user-specific ACLs splattered randomly >> through the filesystem and the members of the cooperating groups >> change? > > Perhaps consult with Winblows AD admins as I'm sure they deal with > this all the time. > > MS$ ACLs have been around for a very long time. > Heh. So we have been reduced to asking Windows admins how to implement best current practice.
- Previous message: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
- Next message: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list