[CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
Stephen Harris
lists at spuddy.orgTue Nov 30 20:49:57 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
- Next message: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 03:11:24PM -0500, Lamar Owen wrote: > Reality check: IDC analysts have estimated Red Hat's share of the paid > commercial Linux market as 62%[1], [2], with Red Hat estimating higher > [3]. That's RHEL: which ships SELinux enabled, enforcing, targeted, > by default. And, this being the CentOS list, we're in a default SELinux Reality check: how many of those installs are RedHat OOB installs with default options? I know the 10,000 machines we have where I work are all meant to be "corporate standard" and this, by default, does _not_ have SELinux enabled. > they should be supporting the default RHEL configuration. Shoulda, coulda, woulda... didna. -- rgds Stephen
- Previous message: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
- Next message: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list