[CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comTue Nov 30 21:52:42 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
- Next message: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 11/30/2010 3:13 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > P.S. I am just waiting for the day when SELinux is going to become locked in > enforcing mode by the kernel developers, much as the traditional permissions > system is a mandatory thing right now. :-D I thought there was a security API in the kernel that was designed specifically _not_ to lock it to an implementation. Is there a standards group for SELinux? It's one thing to follow Posix, something else to be locked to a non-standard concept. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
- Next message: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list