On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Les Mikesell wrote: > To: centos at centos.org > From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Novell sale news? > > On 11/24/10 8:37 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> On 11/24/2010 02:34 PM, Toralf Lund wrote: >>>> Thats good, but how is that even remotely related to his list ? >>>> >>> It's *remotely* related in that it means someone, somewhere must have >>> source code that would probably compile more or less directly under >>> CentOS, for the (currently unsupported) software in question. >> >> well, ok :) >> >> but it would still be nice to see what people think about a >> centos-social or a centos-offtopic or a centos-chatter list. > > What we need is a "What would a good sysadmin think?" list where one of the > criteria for being a good sysadmin would obviously be that you know something > about Centos but the rest of the scope covers applications, conversions, product > comparisons, legal issues, etc. The kind of stuff most of us do every day... Sounds OK to me. Keith -- In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they are not. This email was sent from my laptop with Centos 5.5