On Nov 6, 2010, at 9:04 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote: > Both connections have router on the 192.168.0.1 > address. > > Although I need to stay connected to the wireless router, can I still > access the address 192.168.0.1 on the wired interface? What you want is a NAT to take, say, 192.168.1.0/24 and translate it to the eth0 192.168.0.0/24 network, where the translation occurs at the egress of eth0 (that is, the 192.168.1.0/24 route is set to go out eth0, and the egress (and by extension the ingress) traffic gets translated. How you would do this in iptables I'm not sure; I've done it with Cisco hardware, as this is a common issue when joining two RFC 1918 networks together that have overlapping address space. But at the end you would access 192.168.1.1 and it would get translated to 192.168.0.1 at the eth0 point and wouldn't interfere with the wlan0 version of the 192.168.0.1 address. I'm not exactly 100% sure it can be done without an external NAT box, but a small external router that can do NAT would make it much easier.