Drew a écrit : > > I beg to differ. I've used Dreamweaver for years and while I can't > speak for the latest versions, the MX version released in 2002 > produced some of the cleanest (x)html I've seen. XHTML is supposed to be semantic, e. g. it indicates clearly that "this is a quotation", "this is an abbreviation", etc. The only thing Dreamweaver can do is put cleanly indented <div></div> brackets around everything, to make sure no search engine leafing through the page will ever have the slightest clue about the content. Which is bad. http://www.microlinux.fr --> made with Vim :oD Cheers, Niki