On 11/24/2010 02:34 PM, Toralf Lund wrote: >> Thats good, but how is that even remotely related to his list ? >> > It's *remotely* related in that it means someone, somewhere must have > source code that would probably compile more or less directly under > CentOS, for the (currently unsupported) software in question. well, ok :) but it would still be nice to see what people think about a centos-social or a centos-offtopic or a centos-chatter list. - KB