Toralf Lund wrote:
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 11/24/2010 10:32 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
<snip>
>> Thats good, but how is that even remotely related to his list ?
>>
> It's *remotely* related in that it means someone, somewhere must have
> source code that would probably compile more or less directly under
> CentOS, for the (currently unsupported) software in question.
>
> Apart from that, it's sometimes hard to resist commenting on obviously
> incorrect statements even in an off-topic thread...
<snip>
Not I can't resist the old quote:
Someone, somewhere on usenet, posted something that was ...wrong.
mark