"ATW" == Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam at whitemice.org> ATW> I'm pretty sure they did have such a version; WP was the ATW> first 'real' word processor available for LINUX. I ran ATW> it on a LINUX host and a dozen or so NCD X-terminals. It ATW> worked, but I can't imagine anyone having been a fan. It ATW> was slow, clunky, and just ugly. At a previous job, we ran it on HP-UX (with lots of terminal sessions). Over time, most everyone ended up with Windows machines, but still with WordPerfect/PerfectOffice. By the time I left, there was a push to move to Word (I got out just in time!). ATW> And as for reveal codes... OOo has a mode that displays ATW> non-printable characters. Beyond that I just don't see ATW> the point. OOo's document collaboration and versioning ATW> tools are far and away better than what I recall from WP. These days I prefer LaTeX's reveal-codes feature, with collaboration and versioning provided via Subversion or git. ;-) Claire *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Claire M. Connelly cmc at math.hmc.edu System Administrator, Dept. of Mathematics, Harvey Mudd College *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 188 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20101124/e541b3a8/attachment-0005.sig>