[CentOS] SquashFS: how good is it?
Boris Epstein
borepstein at gmail.comTue Oct 12 19:28:48 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] SquashFS: how good is it?
- Next message: [CentOS] SquashFS: how good is it?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Chad Woolley <thewoolleyman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:44 PM, JohnS <jses27 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 14:37 -0400, Boris Epstein wrote: >>> Hello listmates, >>> >>> Have any of you used SquashFS? >>> >>> See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SquashFS >>> >>> We have tried it on small file sets, seems good but if you have >>> experience using it, especially to store/archive lage volumes of >>> files, please share your experience. >>> >>> Thanks. >> --- >> It is used in the making of Live CDs as in Linux. CentOS Live CD 5 uses > > I was unable to mount it read/write, if that matters. Error said it > could only be mounted read-only. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Yes, SquassFS is a read-only FS. Which is fine for us as we intend to only use it for archiving purposes. Boris.
- Previous message: [CentOS] SquashFS: how good is it?
- Next message: [CentOS] SquashFS: how good is it?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list