Scott Robbins wrote: > On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 06:35:14PM +0200, Mathieu Baudier wrote: >> >> IMHO, the comments in /etc/ldap.conf could be a bit more explicit on >> the 'on' value: > > IMNSHO most docmentation on LDAP is laughable, and perhaps one of the > main reasons Active Directory has become so much more popular. Say what > you want about MS, but it does seem to me, that at least on the syadmin > and user side that their documentation is usually quite good, at least > since Windows 2000. <snip> > As the authors of the excellent ldap for rocket scientists page say. > > "The bad news is that IOHO never has so much been written so > incomprehensibly about a single topic with the possible exceptions of > BIND." > > (That page is at http://www.zytrax.com/books/ldap/) <snip> Well, that's simply *not* true... says the guy who, 20-30 years ago, had to read IBM mainframe manuals.... mark "this postfix left blank"